Krishna filed an unprecedented petition in the Supreme Court, addressing the Kaliyugi form of the Dahi-Handi tradition
The legal journey of Lord Krishna spanned two months as he sought entry into the Kaliyuga judiciary. He successfully engaged a lawyer, a friend of Shakuni, known for his conniving ways. This lawyer was convinced to assist in resolving a property dispute concerning the construction of a bungalow in Dwarka, which allowed Lord Krishna to gain access to the court.
Lord Krishna's plea to the court was to address the disruptions caused by the Dahi-Handi celebrations, especially on the occasion of his birthday. He stated that continuous singing of bhajans and late-night revelry often disrupted the lives of students and elderly citizens. He voiced concern about the rowdy behavior of individuals who, under the pretext of "Govinda," congregated on rooftops, indulged in alcohol, and harassed women on the streets. Their defense often relied on the justification that "Krishna did it in his Raasleela, so can we."
Lord Krishna emphasized the urgency of curbing these disturbances. He pointed out that some of these so-called "Krishnas," who broke pots to steal butter, had gone to the extent of announcing rewards in the millions and billions for breaking pots hung on tall buildings. In response to his plea, various political organizations in Mumbai and Delhi initiated a campaign against Lord Krishna. A conspiracy was set in motion to tarnish his image by spreading false rumors about him on social media.
Members of the LGBT community vehemently opposed any association with figures like Bigg Boss, who had adopted the name of Lord Krishna. They believed that Swamy, a derogatory term, originated from Lord Krishna's title and were steadfast in their opposition to such practices.
Responding to the questions and allegations leveled against him, Lord Krishna highlighted the vast differences between the Dwapar and Kali Yugas. He emphasized that while people traveled by horses and bulls during Dwapar Yuga, modern society had evolved to use cars. He pointed out that in the Dwapar era, breaking the Dahi-Handi was a part of people's cultural practices, while in Kaliyuga, there was no such tradition of causing a commotion in the name of Dahi-Handi.
In its initial verdict on Lord Krishna's petition, the court urged him to refrain from interfering in human affairs and the legal system. The court issued a stern warning, cautioning Lord Krishna against obstructing any religious practices or frivolously consuming the valuable time of the court. It underscored that any such interference would result in consequences akin to those faced by Lord Krishna's parents, Vasudev and Devaki. These consequences could potentially lead to imprisonment. In response, the lawyer who aided Lord Krishna's entry into the legal system has filed a counter-claim against Lord Krishna for failing to allocate a plot for the construction of a bungalow in Dwarka.
Note : Work of fiction, Not a real NEWS.